Since the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has extended the After Final Consideration Pilot Program 2.0 for an additional year, applicants poised to respond to a final rejection may be asking whether taking part in the program would increase chances of an allowance.
Under the program, applicants must respond to a final rejection with a request for consideration along with an amendment that amends at least one independent claim in a manner that does not broaden the claim.
But is AFCP 2.0 worth the effort? If an AFCP 2.0 request results in an allowance, the applicant may have been spared from paying a request for continued examination fee that may have otherwise been required for the examiner to consider particular claim amendments. Additionally, the amendment would be considered more quickly than one accompanied by an RCE. These potential benefits suggest that this program would be of interest to applicants.
Kate Gaudry, Ph.D., of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP addresses possible advantages and disadvantages of the AFCP 2.0 system in her article, “The After Final Consideration Program: Allowance Prospects,” first published in Law360. Gaudry explores factors that affect prosecution options under the program by examining empirical statistics of to-date AFCP 2.0 outcomes.
Interested in learning how to derive statistics on your own portfolio in relation to overall tech centers and examiner allowance rates? Schedule a demo of LexisNexis PatentAdvisor® today.
Get to know your examiner better with more context and a deeper understanding of your examiner’s behavior than ever available before.
With your free trial, you will gain instant access to:
Examiner Search allows you to search by examiner name for a filterable, examiner specific dashboard of patent analytics, including rejection specific statistics, appeal statistics, prosecution statistics, interview statistics, a backlog of RCEs and timeline.
QuickPair easily replaces the USPTO Public PAIR by providing the most robust application details anywhere, including examiner timeline, examiner allowance rate and the average time and number of office actions to allowance.
PatentAdvisor, the first-ever data-driven patent strategy tool, provides a systemic approach to crafting an effective prosecution strategy. Understand why certain patent applications take longer than others to reach allowance—then use that knowledge to devise better patent prosecution strategies.